Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Soph's avatar

I read The Secret History and now I’m reading The Penelopiad!

Expand full comment
Joseph DeBolt's avatar

What I Read In October

Nice variety of works you read this time, Andy. Someday I’ll get to Rex Stout. By Wharton, I read Ethan Frome in June of last year – tense! Isaiah is a rich book, full of history, symbolism, and prophecy. I don’t discourage commentaries or other books examining it, but the Holy Spirit is the one who can open your eyes to all of its facets, in His time. The horror essays look promising – any less-than-contemporary writers represented? I see Moreno-Garcia’s blurb on the cover. She was the Guest of Honor at the last Balticon. I got her to autograph Mexican Gothic, but the book of hers I read was The Daughter of Doctor Moreau, which I enjoyed.

I think your Sproul book is worth a look. Although the book may be dated, the foundational ideas remain timeless; morality doesn’t really change with the times, despite modern thinking. Perhaps with a read, the topics can be extrapolated to account for contemporary trends. I might look into the Bavinck book. I came to faith through an intellectual decision, where my faith grew gradually rather than through an instant, born-again change in character and demeanor. So, having never been earthly-sure, and never receiving clear and ecstatic communication through the Holy Spirit (only subtle hints and conscience nudges), it’s easy to wonder if I could prove I’m saved. Do you think Bavinck can shine any useful light in my direction?

The books I finished in October were:

Watership Down, by Richard Adams. I’d wanted to read this for years because I wondered why it was so popular when released. (The first printing was actually quite small, but when it was “discovered” a year later, it flooded the market). The story engaged me. The audiobook was read by Ralph Cosham, who narrated the two C. S. Lewis audiobooks I read, so I couldn’t help comparing the story to Narnia, with its reasoning animals. The characters were well-rounded and vivid, and caused quite a bit of stress during the story! (That’s a good thing.) I don't think I missed any subtext because in the introduction, the author said he wrote an adventure story for his kids. But reviewers and analysts can read all sorts of stuff into fiction that the author never intended. (Go for it!)

The Fall of Hyperion, by Dan Simmons. I finally read the sequel to Hyperion, and in between I had read The Canterbury Tales, a structural source for the Simmons books. The main character is based on the engrams of John Keats; his poem “Endymion” is integral to the story. Canterbury didn’t really shed any light on Simmons’ work for me; simply a structure thing. The Keats poem is like the Mississippi River – really long and of uncertain depth. I did not get to the end of the poem. I should do so, to get a little more fulfilment out of The Fall of Hyperion. The next book in the series is called Endymion. TFoH had great characters, a suspenseful story, and a wild ending risking the entire known galaxy. I still don’t get the Shrike, though. It’s not a religious icon I would be drawn to. It seems to be used for personal gain. The legend says that if a group of people approaches it, the Shrike will grant the wish of one of the group and kill the rest. I don’t like the odds. Even if the group comprises only two.

I don’t know how I got Twilight, by Stephanie Meyer, on my reading list; perhaps someone whose views I respected mentioned it. SPOILER ALERT! The first half is all teen romance stuff. It doesn’t get good until the second half. Nice, suspenseful, and action-filled ending with twists. I can see how it launched a new subgenre of teen vampire and teen-wolf stories. I’m reading one of those free bookpacks on Kindle with 13 books in it (The Paranormal 13), and so far, they all have that Twilight feel, though not written as well. That which is at first original can soon become blase.

The Light Fantastic, by Terry Pratchett. If you love Douglas Adams, you’ll love his literary stepson, Terry Pratchett. Same brand of zany, punny wit, but worked perfectly into the story, with a dramatic plot, characters you like, dislike, and loathe, wizards, and even a dimensionally transcendental walking suitcase. The book title itself is a pun. I found it very funny and dramatic – another end-of-the-world threat, but on Discworld, it’s different.

On October 31, I finished the audiobook version of Journey to the Center of the Earth by Jules Verne. I had read it in Junior High School or thereabouts and didn’t think much of it. Verne is a bit difficult for youngsters; 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea was a chore at the time. But since my random-book-choosing method selected “Verne,” and I was choosing an audiobook, and the first available book that came up was JttCofE, I selected that. And it’s been so long that I didn’t remember anything from the book. One thing I certainly missed as a child was the humor portrayed by the woe-is-me main character, the nephew. So the story was fairly amusing. And although science fiction, verisimilitude was lost for me in the character of monosyllabic Hans, who had almost no function except as a hired laborer and lifesaver. Well, maybe lifesaving is important. But in the real world, at some point, he would have said (in Icelandic), "I'm outta here!" Disappointingly, it seems that the adventure is just beginning when it ends. I am also skeptical that the scientific community would have been as overawed as in the book for a journey with so few results. Listening to an audiobook is an experience different than reading a book, and it is worth it. Since I listen while commuting, it doesn’t seem a waste of time, though a part of me thinks, “There are too many books in the world to read one twice!”

So that’s October. Currently reading Tribulation Force, by LaHaye and Jenkins; Universe 7, edited by Terry Carr; and Let Me Tell You: New Stories, Essays and Other Writings, by Shirley Jackson.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?